Write a 10 page Ministry business plan with PowerPoint. With 8 reference a minimum of seven other scholarly sources

Write a 10 page Ministry business plan with PowerPoint. With 8 reference a minimum of seven other scholarly sources other than one class textbooks. (There can be no more than three Internet reference) Must have 4 citations Business plan must address these critical questions facing an organization, including: What is the primary purpose? Were are we now?Where are we going as a organization? What are we trying to archive? a. How will we get there? Who are the key target audiences that we serve? What organizations are similar to our? a. What are they doing to accomplish their mission? b. How are they acquiring resources? What are our core competencies? What do we do best? What could we do best? How much money do we need to accomplish our mission? From the book Faith-Based Management by Peter C. Brinckerhoff Business plan outline.. starting at page 209-210

Final Project For your final project, you will choose one of the following options and write 1000-word essay sharing

Final Project

For your final project, you will choose one of the following options and write 1000-word essay sharing your view of the topic. The response should include a minimum of 3 – 5 sources. This can include the text book and other sources such as art, videos, songs, film, architecture. The essay should be in APA format including all citations and references for media. Include a title page, abstract page, body, and references page. For help with APA formatting, go to Getting Started and scroll down to APA Study Resources.
1000-1250 words.
Format using 6th edition APA requirements to include an abstract of about 150 words.
Use three to five sources including the textbook (cited in the text and on a references page)
No more than 20% of the paper should be from source support.
Evidence critical thinking and critical analysis skills
OPTION 1. After considering the following quote, write a response to the following question: How can the Humanities help society build toward the future? What role can the Humanities play?

“Every generation faces the same challenge, to engage with the past and to cope with the present, while building its future. However, the questions and problems inherent in human life remain the same. It is a given that our society can only progress if we work toward handling ever newly rising demands in appropriate ways based on what we know and understand in practical and theoretical terms; but the drumming toward the future cannot be a one-way street. Instead, we have to operate with a Janus-faced strategy, with one eye kept toward tomorrow, and the other eye toward the past.” (Classen, 2014)
Classen, A. (2014). The challenges of the humanities, past, present, and future: Why the middle ages mean so much for us today and tomorrow. Humanities, 3(1), 1-18. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/h3010001
OPTION 2. Myths and Contemporary Life. The hero is an archetype found in almost every culture; hence the label world myth. Because their appeal is so strong, they re-emerge again and again. Hero myths are particularly important to children and young people. Choose a film that promotes a hero and consider the impact it may have on a young audience. In particular, consider what cultural values the film may underline. Does the prospect of “us versus them” lead to a divided society? Why does the myth of hero endure?
OPTION 3. Henry David Thoreau called himself a naturalist in his decision to live away from human community. He thought urbanism a sad way to live, a life “of quiet desperation.” Respond to the idea that life is either a solitary pursuit or a communal experience by sharing artifacts (songs, films, art, poetry, architecture) that supports your view.
OPTION 4. If Morality is the basis for differentiating between actions that are “good” or right and those that are “bad” or wrong when we are making choices among significant options. What does music, film, television frequently focuses on behaviors that are typically questionable. For example: Rap music promoting gangster style behavior, overly violent films and television, toxic masculinity, music videos that objectify women. In an essay, share your view on whether popular music, and film or television artists are expressing their freedom or producing morally questionable pieces.
Option 5. According to Dr. David Muller, Mount Sinai’s dean for medical education: “Science is the foundation of an excellent medical education, but a well-rounded humanist is best suited to make the most of that education.” Mount Sinai accepts humanities majors from a handful of top-flight liberal arts schools after their second year of college. These students are expected to continue to follow their nonscientific interests for the remainder of their college careers, while preparing for medical school to come. According to former dean Dr. Norman Kase, who began the program “ [I] really had a firm belief that you couldn’t be a good doctor and a well-rounded doctor — relate to patients and communicate with them — unless you really had a good grounding in the liberal arts.” How important is the Humanities to a career in health care? Cite three or four areas of focus from the textbook that would benefit a student pursuing a career in health care. Link to article: Medical School Lures Humanities Majors

Paper due in 2 days. The paper is to be 3-4 pages (900-1,200 words) long. paper is on how you believe vaccinations are a choice Paper is to be APA format.

Paper needs to be about Your position is: How you believe vaccinations should be a choice. Being not allowed to go places if not vaccinated in America Prove if there are laws against non vaccinated people in America Discuss how non vaccinated are treated in America Talk about how Illinois gov pass bill/ law if not vaccinated you have to weekly test if you are in a state school Make it clear that I am not personally Vaccinated and state it at the end of paper

Paper due in 2 days. The paper is to be 3-4 pages (900-1,200 words) long. paper is on how you believe vaccinations are a choice Paper is to be APA format.

Paper needs to be about Your position is: How you believe vaccinations should be a choice. Being not allowed to go places if not vaccinated in America Prove if there are laws against non vaccinated people in America Discuss how non vaccinated are treated in America Talk about how Illinois gov pass bill/ law if not vaccinated you have to weekly test if you are in a state school Make it clear that I am not personally Vaccinated and state it at the end of paper

The age of Baroque saw the emergence of the Modern World, fueled by scientific achievements, international trade, and greater Essay

The age of Baroque saw the emergence of the Modern World, fueled by scientific achievements, international trade, and greater prosperity for a growing number of capitalists. The arts of the seventeenth century share a common approach that is grandiose, exuberant, and international in its appeal. Discuss these artistic achievements with a focus on one masterwork from each of the areas of visual arts and music. Your paper should be typed with double-spaces. The writing style needs to be formal: no personal tense, no contractions, and no colloquialisms. Develop your thoughts into clearly defined paragraphs (at least three sentences and a topic sentence). Your grade will be based on both content and writing style. In-text citations (author, page) should be used for original ideas or direct quotations. Research is not required, but use Works Cited at the conclusion of the paper if you have quoted sources. • Format: MLA preferred, but you many use another style you are familiar with • Typed with double-spacing • Length: 3-5 pages •Give specific examples–visual art, music, literature–to back up your points • Formal writing style–grammar and spelling will be considered

1) Please select 3-4 questions to answer. Be sure to submit a discussion post with proper punctuation, grammar, and

1) Please select 3-4 questions to answer. Be sure to submit a discussion post with proper punctuation, grammar, and at least 300 words. Please cite!

DISCUSSION 1:
-What would you like for us to know about you? (Major, career goals, hobbies, accomplishments, etc.)
-What pronouns do you use?
-Name 2 singers or groups to know you by. Ex: During my childhood car rides to Texas we listened to The Isley Brothers and Al Green on repeat.
-Name 2 movies or TV shows to know you by. Ex: I always stop to watch The Godfather/The Godfather Part II and Love Jones whenever they are on TV.
-Describe something that you were originally apprehensive of; however, after trying it, you loved it. Ex: I grew up eating grits with butter and sugar (no judgments, please), and I thought that oatmeal looked like mush. I tried it a few years back, and I can now say that I love oatmeal. I cannot believe that I wasted so much time refusing to eat it.
-Who has cultivated your genius or has inspired you to become the best version of yourself? It can be someone that you have never met.
-If you could create a mutual aid program to assist people in your community, who would you help?

DISCUSSION 2:

-Question 1: Do you view the U.S. Constitution as a document that should be interpreted as the founders created it in 1787 (originalist theory) or as a living document that should be interpreted to reflect the changes in America? Does guaranteeing “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” for those who feel oppressed under the current U.S. Constitution depend on how the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) interprets the law? What would that mean for historically excluded groups (HEG’s are people who have been excluded from receiving the full rights and privileges in society. Ex: women, people of color, the LGBTQ community, people with disabilities, etc.)? Why are some people still granted more rights than others? Should the demographic changes in the U.S. population reflect how the U.S. Constitution is interpreted? Why?

Question 1 Breakdown (You may select 1 question to answer or answer multiple questions.): When the U.S. Constitution was originally written the only people who had power were wealthy, land-holding White men. That means that if you were a poor White man, a woman, a person of color, or a person with a disability then you did not have the ability to vote, make decisions, or have true freedom. The framers of the U.S. Constitution attempted to draft a document that could evolve over time. When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) considers cases like reproductive rights and gun rights, it depends on how they interpret the U.S. Constitution. View: Should We Consider the Constitution to Be ‘Living’ or ‘Dead’?
Questions: Now that you have reviewed the video, do you think that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted as a ‘dead’ document (originalist theory) or as a ‘living’ document? Why? If you view the U.S. Constitution as a ‘dead’ document (originalist theory), then how does that impact historically excluded groups or the people originally left out of the U.S. Constitution? There are now more people of color in America, should the U.S. Constitution change to reflect the new demographic changes? How can the U.S. Constitution guarantee “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” for oppressed people?

Question 2: Within the system of separation of powers, provide 1 recourse the current executive and legislative branches have to counteract potential political overreach if SCOTUS overturns Roe v. Wade. Explain how checks and balance would work if a liberal-leaning president refused to execute the orders of a conservative-leaning SCOTUS. What would be the political, social, and democratic implications? Would it be constitutional for SCOTUS to overturn Roe v. Wade but in the New York State Rifle

Video Response Paper The following guidelines will help you write video response/ reaction papers for Sociology 101. The response

Video Response Paper

The following guidelines will help you write video response/ reaction papers for Sociology 101. The response should be 2-3 pages.

1. Watch the documentary and take notes
You can only write a review or response to a documentary when you understand all its elements, contents, and message. If possible, it is a good idea to watch the documentary more than once in order to properly digest it. While watching the documentary, think of it as a story: note some of the striking features of the film, like characters, scenes, messages and how they are conveyed to you. As you take notes, try to make arguments, make comparisons between the elements.

2. Identify the focus of your review
The basis of a reaction paper is your opinion or thoughts about the documentary. These opinions and thoughts should be backed by examples or evidence from the film. Develop your idea based on how the documentary touched you. In the case you felt it was good, give a reason with evidence to support that claim. The same should also be applied to when you are in disagreement with the material.

When identifying the focus of your paper do not simply look at the documentary, instead, compare it with your general knowledge, other films on the same subject and even comments from experts in that field. You can also relate the documentary to your personal experiences.

A good response paper should be focused on a unique perspective that is outstanding from the documentary. Consider: what did you find interesting? What did you agree with? What did you disagree with? What surprised you? What was troubling?

3. Determine the elements to discuss
After identifying your opinion, collect points and evidence to support it. Gather sufficient points that are striking from the film to use in proving your reaction. That is, for every key point, provide evidence from the documentary to use in proving it. All the points that you make should connect back to the focus of the paper.

You can also do some research to find out more about the points to discuss in order to present a logical and compelling review (but this is not required!). Be specific in choosing the elements to discuss for clarity. For every point, identify about two or three examples to support it.

4. Create an outline
An outline is a simple plan showing how you intend to present the review. It should briefly highlight the introduction, body, and conclusion of the paper. The purpose of the outline is to provide you with a “blueprint” of the paper and easy reference when writing.
Just like other academic papers, a response paper should follow a particular writing format. The following procedures will direct you on how to write a reaction paper to a documentary.
a. Introduce the paper
Begin by giving a brief and accurate summary of the documentary in the opening statements of the paper. Here include basic information about the piece, including its title, producer, characters, etc.

b. Evaluate the documentary
This should make up the bulk of the paper, and present a comprehensive evaluation of the documentary. This section highlights the body paragraphs and should clearly indicate that you have watched and understood the context of the film. Every paragraph should properly establish and explain your position or response to the documentary, backed with evidence and examples. Devote every paragraph to a particular idea and a few related evidences. Your stance can be supportive or opposed to the view of the producer of the film.

c. Write the conclusion
The final paragraph of a response paper should present a summary of your position on the piece. This can be achieved through restating the focus of the paper and the key points that are discussed in the body paragraphs. Remember that the conclusion should just be short and not open a fresh discussion. Avoid introducing a new idea in the conclusion since that would confuse readers and alter the flow of ideas in the paper.

On the final part, you can also compare the documentary with others in the same genre or subject in order to make readers have a better understanding of the review.

Write a 5-7 page paper (double spaced, 12 point font, standard margins) on one of the following topics. Please cite all your sources, with an accepted citational standard of your choice. The sources y

Please cite all your sources, with an accepted citational standard of your choice. The sources you may use will be:
Reading material assigned in class
Other material written by the authors assigned or mentioned in class
Material about the authors assigned of mentioned in class, and their ideas
(1) Some theories in economics posit that poverty and inequality exist because of kinds of relationships between different groups in the economy (for example, the relationship between workers and capitalists, or the relationship between the Global North and the Global South). Other theories posit that poverty and plenty (and hence, inequality) don’t come from relationships between groups, but from the actions or circumstances of those who are poor and those who have plenty (i.e. savings and growth, industrial policy, geography). Describe in detail two distinct theories or mechanisms from each group, for four in total. Conclude with your own evaluation of these theories: how well do they explain the various dimensions of poverty and inequality in the world?

to analyze the anthropic principle argument , I have to say why is good or why is not good

I have to analyze one of this arguments and say why is good or bad argument and it has to have a little summary about the argument in question. Chose one of this :a) intuitive factors, b)cosmology: 1)the Big Bang, 2)The so-called larger number hypothesis, 3)The anthropic principle. c) The fossil record. d) Biochemical complexity.
the paper need to have a introduction(opening)
thesis statement (the claim to be supported)
plan for the paper
Background for the thesis
Argument supporting the thesis
assessment of objection and conclusion.
MLA formant and citation
Free of plagiarism